Skip to content
corpus.

Corpus / Work and review

A result should
earn its trust.

A maker produces a candidate. A reviewer examines that candidate against what was asked. If the work changes, the next review needs to examine the changed result.

  1. 01 / Candidate

    Make the work
    inspectable.

    The requirement says what would count as done. The maker presents a candidate and its evidence for independent review.

  2. 02 / Review

    Record what
    was checked.

    The review concerns the candidate as delivered. An amendment identifies a change to make; the judgment stays attached to the version inspected.

  3. 03 / Revision

    Examine the
    changed result.

    A materially changed candidate calls for fresh review. Keep the earlier result and its review available so a later reader can follow what changed.

The product idea

Keep the judgment attached.

A useful record connects a judgment to the work actually inspected. It helps a later reader distinguish an earlier result from a revision and an open question from a resolved one.

Inspect the custody findings ↗

Try the question

What can the next person trust?

REQ-856 gives a real example: a 5,012-byte handoff, an exact candidate snapshot, a reviewer’s observed output, and a separate landing receipt. Read the evidence chain. The handoff lab below is a fictional exercise.

Try the fictional handoff lab ↗